Denison University - Granville, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% |
2 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% |
3 | STREB JR. Joseph T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
3 | BURTE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | |
5 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 9% | |
6 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | |
7 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% | 11% | |
8 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 83% | 26% | 3% | - | |
9 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | |
10 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 17% |
11 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% |
12 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 89% | 35% | 4% | - |
13 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 20% | - |
14 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 91% | 49% | 9% | |
15 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 8% | |
16 | LINDOW Connor | 100% | 89% | 31% | 4% | - | |
17 | MANDZY Theodor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 8% |
18 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | 1% |
19 | KABARITI Karim | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 8% | |
20 | FREDERICK David R. | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | |
21 | LATTA Zamir | 100% | 64% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
22 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 64% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
23 | SMITH Brandon T. | 100% | 69% | 21% | 2% | - | |
23 | SIDARAS John | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | |
25 | HUGHES Evan | 100% | 52% | 6% | - | - | - |
26 | BRENTLINGER III Charles | 100% | 51% | 6% | - | - | - |
27 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah O. | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.