The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CAO Chong | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
2 | TAN Daniel | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
3 | WANG James | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 9% |
3 | IRVINE Cooper | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
5 | LUO Gavin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
6 | MENDOZA YSABELLA LOUISE | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
7 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
8 | HAGENBUCH Isabella | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
9 | CHEN Chelsea | 12% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
10 | LEE Caleb | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
11 | CISLER Lemon | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
12 | VAN ROY Petra | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
13 | XU Chenxi | < 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
14 | ROGERS Dashiell | < 1% | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.