Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 12% | 88% |
2 | LI Arvin | - | - | 5% | 41% | 54% |
3 | XU Ethan | - | 1% | 11% | 54% | 34% |
3 | LI Bradley | - | 1% | 15% | 52% | 32% |
5 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 84% |
6 | SHAO Eric | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 25% |
7 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 45% |
8 | LI Aaron | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
9 | LIU Derek | - | 1% | 13% | 56% | 30% |
10 | FENG Michael | - | 4% | 27% | 60% | 8% |
11 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | 6% | 44% | 50% |
12 | YANG Dylan | 2% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 7% |
13 | WANG Mason | - | 4% | 28% | 61% | 6% |
14 | CHENG Logan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
15 | SENANI Arjun | 4% | 32% | 52% | 11% | 1% |
16 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 8% | 37% | 45% | 10% | - |
17 | LI Ayren | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
18 | ZHAO Brian | 10% | 45% | 37% | 7% | - |
19 | LAO Kevin | 13% | 45% | 36% | 6% | - |
20 | STAFFORD Gareth | 8% | 39% | 45% | 7% | - |
21 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 17% | 49% | 30% | 3% | - |
22 | BALDWIN Benjamin | 7% | 37% | 40% | 15% | 2% |
23 | SURESH Rohan | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
24 | ZHAO Brandon | 16% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
25 | RIPA Joseph K. | 31% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - |
26 | SABATINO Patrick | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
27 | MCENTEE Owen | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
28 | XU Brian | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
29 | CHUN Zachary | 48% | 42% | 10% | - | - |
30 | FORTES PINA Adrian | 16% | 52% | 28% | 3% | - |
31 | BISHOP Henry | 6% | 37% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
32 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
33 | BERETICH Brian | 51% | 40% | 9% | - | - |
34 | ZHENG Harrison | 9% | 41% | 42% | 8% | - |
35 | DENG Kenny | 30% | 48% | 20% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.