Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Brian | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
2 | BANG Hyeonjin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
3 | CHEN Leo | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% |
3 | HUCHWAJDA Marcel | - | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
5 | CHAVES Matthew J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
6 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 38% | 10% |
7 | REN James | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
8 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
9 | WOODWARD Connor | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
10 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
11 | WANG Charles | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
12 | LEE Aydan J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% |
13 | COX Luis E. | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
14 | LEE Jejun | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
15 | ZHU Charlie | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
16 | HOTHA Nikhil | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
17 | WELLS Griffin | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
18 | HU Christopher | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
19 | ZHANG Tianran | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
20 | HIREMATH Kushal | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | GAUVEY Kieran | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
22 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
23 | BAERMAN Michael | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | WANG Andrew | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
25 | SU Landon | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
26 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 10% | 52% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
27 | CLARK Keagan | 10% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
28 | ZHOU James Y. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
30 | HEANEY Sam | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
31 | SONG Tony | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
33 | CHATTOO Elias | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.