Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 2 | BANG Hyeonjin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | |
| 3 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 33% |
| 3 | HUCHWAJDA Marcel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 5 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 6 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% | 10% |
| 7 | REN James | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 8 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% |
| 10 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 11 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% | |
| 12 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% |
| 13 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | LEE Jejun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
| 15 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | HOTHA Nikhil | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | WELLS Griffin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 18 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 19 | ZHANG Tianran | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 20 | HIREMATH Kushal | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | GAUVEY Kieran | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BAERMAN Michael | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SU Landon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 26 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 100% | 90% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | CLARK Keagan | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | HEANEY Sam | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | SONG Tony | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | CHATTOO Elias | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.