Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Kevin | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | DANNULL Lukas J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | JOHNSON Langston C. | D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 5 | GILMORE Thomas W. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 6 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | BRAR Sanjeet | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | REN Richard | V V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 11 | PAN Andrew W. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | FORT David | V D V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 13 | KENNEDY Liam A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | CRISAFULLI Francesco R. | V D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 15 | CHANG Eliot A. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | WOODWARD Connor | D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | V V D V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | BANG Hyeonjin | V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 19 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | LEONARD Cole | D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | COX Luis E. | D V D V V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 22 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | D V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | ZHOU Brian | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 24 | KOSURI Harsha | D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | ZHANG Tianran | D D V D V | D | 0.3 | 2 | +1.7 |
| 26 | LU Caleb Q. | D V V D D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | ROZENTAL Robert | V D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | WANG Charles | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 29 | COSGROVE Connor R. | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | CHIN Matthew W. | V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | MENTA Varun | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | ZHU Charlie | D D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | HYUNGJUN lee | D D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | CHEN Leo | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 35 | CHAVES Matthew J. | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | HOLDEN Joseph | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | DESHETLER Scott | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | D V D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.