Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | MENG Xiang | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | DOLAN Charles R. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | MORALES Jonathan | D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | TE VELDE Noah C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | LIN Maxim | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | LAUB William | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 8 | CHENIER Marc-Olivier | V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 9 | PENG Bryan | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | MEI Yujie | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | MICHELL Bailey | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | CHEN Jonathan | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | SAVOY Luca | D V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | SIMMONS John M. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | ONG Dylan | V D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 17 | BRANDT Jaden | V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | MCMAHON Chris J. | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 19 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | WEN Edward | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | CHUNG Connor | D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | MARGULIS Jared | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | FISK Ethan | D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | MEYERSON Jacob | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | ALLUM Christopher T. | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | V D V D D V | V | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | SORENSEN Walker | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | LIEUWMA Nicolas | D V D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 29 | LEONARDI Pierce C. | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | SHINCHUK Daniel | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | PIWOWAR Alex | D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | DZIALO George A. | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 33 | WEHLE Paul | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | CHENG Brandon | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 35 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | PODDAR Shameek | D D V D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 37 | PERINO Alex | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 38 | SUMNER Nicholas | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 39 | LORENZ Evan | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 40 | LIU Eric | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | SHINCHUK Jacob | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 42 | AVRAMIS Adam | D D D V D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 43 | KUO Alden S. | D D D D D V | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 | |
| 44 | KALOUDIS Sean | D D D D V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 45 | HUANG Ivan | D D D V D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
| 46 | HUTTON Sawyer | D D V D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
| 47 | COFFIN Carleton | D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
| 48 | COOKSON Leonardo | D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 49 | BLACKBURN Henry | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 50 | CHIN Nigel | D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.