Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CARTER Jane P. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
2 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
3 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
3 | ROWLAND May | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
5 | SISE Camilla R. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
6 | DREW Dorothea M. | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
7 | REYNOLDS Nancy | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
8 | DUSINLLEUX Kate D. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
9 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
10 | TOLLEY Toby | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
11 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
12 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
13 | CHOY Ida | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 41% | 9% |
14 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
14 | STAVISKY Natalia | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
16 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
17 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
18 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
19 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
20 | KELLY Diane A. | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
21 | SETO Karen | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
22 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
23 | CAFASSO Sabrina | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
24 | TASKER Monisha B. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | CURTIN Rebecca | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
26 | SIMON Sally R. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
26 | BRODEUR Andrea | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
28 | HEARNE Rosa | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | PHO Kara | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
30 | BECK Sara | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.