Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 2 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 3 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
| 3 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | |
| 5 | BUSH Thomas | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 6 | PHO Eric | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 7 | PRIHODKO Andrew | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 8 | SPRINGER Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | |
| 9 | HARRIS Robert S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 19% |
| 10 | CAFASSO Martin | - | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | FOLEY Kevin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 14 | BUISINE Sebastien | 59% | 34% | 6% | < 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 16 | GACS Kalman J. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | STEWART Robert | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 18 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | SPAHN Jeff | - | - | 4% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 1% | 12% | 56% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | KAIN Brad | 1% | 16% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | SAMBROOK Roger C. | 6% | 42% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | SANTOS Felipe | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | WHITELOCK James R. | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | PARTE Aidan | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | MARINI Davide | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | MARSHALL William L. | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | HIGGINS Paul | 52% | 44% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 29 | HU Jansen T. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 31 | RUGGLES William R. | 9% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WALTING Paul J. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | MILES Ronald D. | 11% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | VILLARS Philip | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | BENNETT Paul | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | TARDIFF Seth | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | RAULINAITIS Joseph A. | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | LONADIER Robert | 35% | 54% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.