Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 2 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 3 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 3 | DEPOMMIER Remi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | |
| 5 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 6 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 7 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 8 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | |
| 9 | HARRIS Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% |
| 10 | CAFASSO Martin | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 11 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | |
| 12 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% |
| 13 | FOLEY Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% |
| 14 | BUISINE Sebastien | 100% | 41% | 7% | < 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 16 | GACS Kalman J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
| 17 | STEWART Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 18 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
| 20 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 99% | 88% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 99% | 83% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | SAMBROOK Roger C. | 100% | 94% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 99% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | HIGGINS Paul | 100% | 48% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 29 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 31 | RUGGLES William R. | 100% | 91% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | MILES Ronald D. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | VILLARS Philip | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
| 34 | BENNETT Paul | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | TARDIFF Seth | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | RAULINAITIS Joseph A. | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 65% | 11% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.