Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% |
2 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | - | 4% | 48% | 47% | |
3 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 6% | 94% | |
3 | YANG emma | - | - | 3% | 27% | 67% | 3% | |
5 | MEI Sarah | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% | |
6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% | |
7 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
8 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% | |
9 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
9 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
11 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 5% |
12 | BABIAC Julia | - | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
13 | FENG Audrey | - | 5% | 31% | 55% | 8% | - | |
15 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 4% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
16 | LI Shuang | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 39% | 10% | |
17 | CHEN Sophie | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 6% | 29% | 48% | 16% | |
19 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
20 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 5% | 52% | 43% | |
21 | HAO Danica | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 34% | 3% |
22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
23 | RICHARD Dominique | - | 4% | 31% | 53% | 12% | - | |
24 | SVENGSOUK Jocelyn L. | - | 7% | 37% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
25 | LIU Long | - | 17% | 53% | 27% | 3% | - | |
26 | FELLMAN Sara | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | - |
27 | RICHARD Clara | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
28 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
29 | MEYER Claudia | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
31 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | |
32 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 1% | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
33 | RYDMAN Grace | 40% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
34 | YANIV Liya | 5% | 40% | 44% | 10% | - | - | |
35 | OLSEN Jen | 1% | 8% | 38% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
36 | POWLEDGE Cora | 5% | 40% | 44% | 10% | - | - | |
37 | WANG Sabrina | - | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
38 | LAO Sophia | 3% | 64% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
39 | LAU Elena | 6% | 60% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | - | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | - | |
41 | MILLÁN GARCÍA Ana | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
42 | MALONEY Adelaide | 2% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | BURNHAM Clarice | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
44 | IREZ Lyra | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
45 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
45 | MERCHANT Reem | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
47 | FENTON Barbara R. | 86% | 13% | - | - | - | - | |
47 | RIZAL Ojaswee (Oju) | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
47 | WALSH Grace | 37% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | ATTICKS rachel | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.