Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
| 2 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 47% | |
| 3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | |
| 3 | YANG emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 3% | |
| 5 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 18% | |
| 6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | |
| 7 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 8 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | |
| 9 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | |
| 11 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 5% |
| 12 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 100% | 85% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 13 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 9% | - | |
| 15 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 10% | |
| 17 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 99% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 16% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 20 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 43% | |
| 21 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 3% |
| 22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 8% | |
| 23 | RICHARD Dominique | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 12% | - | |
| 24 | SVENGSOUK Jocelyn L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | LIU Long | 100% | 100% | 83% | 30% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | - |
| 27 | RICHARD Clara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 28 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 31 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 100% | 99% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | RYDMAN Grace | 100% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 95% | 55% | 10% | - | - | |
| 35 | OLSEN Jen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 36 | POWLEDGE Cora | 100% | 95% | 55% | 10% | - | - | |
| 37 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | LAO Sophia | 100% | 97% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | LAU Elena | 100% | 94% | 34% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 100% | 100% | 84% | 43% | 9% | - | |
| 41 | MILLÁN GARCÍA Ana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | MALONEY Adelaide | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BURNHAM Clarice | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | IREZ Lyra | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
| 45 | MERCHANT Reem | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
| 47 | FENTON Barbara R. | 100% | 14% | - | - | - | - | |
| 47 | RIZAL Ojaswee (Oju) | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 47 | WALSH Grace | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | ATTICKS rachel | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.