Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 2 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 3 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 3 | REN Richard | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 5 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 6 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 7 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 8 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 9 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | KOSURI Harsha | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 11 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 12 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 10% |
| 15 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 16 | HOLDEN Joseph | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | BANG Hyeonjin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 18 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHOU Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | FORT David | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 22 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | HYUNGJUN lee | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | MENTA Varun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | BAERMAN Michael | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | CLARK Keagan | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Tianran | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.