Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MAKMATOV Vadim | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
2 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
3 | MACZIK Adam W. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% |
3 | LIOU Solomon | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
5 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
6 | ROSTAL Scott E. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 61% | 12% | |
7 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | 1% | |
8 | PAI Dong-Ying | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
9 | LOISEAU Cedric | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% | |
10 | HANSEN Eric J. | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
11 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 1% | 9% | 35% | 42% | 13% | - | |
12 | PHO Eric | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
13 | STONE Brian M. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
14 | FERKO Philip J. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 48% | 37% |
15 | CHU Brandon A. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
16 | GORMLEY Robert | - | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
17 | CARTER Austin L. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
18 | PEI Suyang | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | |
19 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
20 | CHENG Thomas | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
21 | WILKINSON Derek H. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
22 | GROSSE Michael | - | 1% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
23 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 1% |
24 | SANTOS Felipe | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
25 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
26 | TURNER Joshua | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
27 | MENDOZA Zandro | - | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% |
28 | LIN Kimball | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% |
29 | WORLEY Aren R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 1% |
30 | KENT IV David | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
31 | WILLIAMS Charles | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | VILLAREAL Quentin | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | SHULL Marc | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - |
34 | DEPAUW Devan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% | |
35 | KIM Jeff | - | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
36 | BARANOWSKI Philip | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
37 | SUICO louie | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
38 | BELLIVEAU Shane | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
39 | LYTLE Evan | - | - | 6% | 32% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
40 | WANG Zhenhai | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | STERR Eric | 3% | 26% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
42 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 8% | - | |
43 | EVERT Todd | 2% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 5% | - | |
44 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
45 | DANIELS Jonathan | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
46 | SLOAN Ryan | 1% | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | CHECKEYE Daniel J. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | STAUBITZ Marc | 8% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | CONN Brian | - | - | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
50 | MORET Eric N. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
51 | STOY Patrick | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
52 | DAN Chuntao | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
53 | SAYLER Gordon | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
54 | SCIACCA Nick | - | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% | |
55 | TOMASI John | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
56 | REED David | 8% | 49% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - |
57 | FRANGER Jeff | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | OLSON McGee | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
59 | KONG Qingjun | 37% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | STOCKTON J. DeVeaux | 45% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
61 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
62 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 42% | 52% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
63 | TARDIFF Seth | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
64 | GREEN Scott D. | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
65 | WILLIAMS Brian | 39% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.