Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
2 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% |
3 | LIM Nona | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
3 | BERMAN Frauke | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
5 | FOLEY Eileen | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 17% |
6 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
7 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
8 | THORNTON Eva | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
9 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
10 | DUDNICK Shannon | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
11 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
12 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
13 | DUBROVINA Irene | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
14 | AMBALONG Jody P. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
15 | SIERRA Kate | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% |
16 | GLUCK Myriam | - | 1% | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
17 | WEBB Maud | 2% | 17% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | FEITLER Sarah | - | 10% | 44% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
19 | OISHI Yoko | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - |
20 | PEIN Annette | 1% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | JOHNSON Pamela | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | WU Yik Chun | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | NESTERUK Hope | 17% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | CONNOLLY Grace | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
25 | JANDECKA Darlene | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
26 | STCLAIREKING Tiffany | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
27 | SUZUKI HAN Alisa | 13% | 63% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | MOHR Carol | 51% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.