Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 2 | BUECHEL Holly M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 3 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 3 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 6 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 7 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 8 | WELLS Tesla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 11 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 12 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 15 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 17 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 17 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 15% |
| 19 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 20 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 22 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 24 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 25 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 26 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 27 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | YOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 6% |
| 30 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 31 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | VASYAKIN Liana | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | ROVATI Caterina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 35 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 36 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 37 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 9% |
| 38 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 39 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 40 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 42 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
| 46 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 47 | XU Celina | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ZMURK Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 49 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | ZHAO Alina | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 52 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 96% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 55 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 56 | QIU Emily | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 57 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 58 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 59 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | FOELLMER Kristin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 62 | MYRAH Vivienne | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 64 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 65 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 66 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 67 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 69 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 14% |
| 70 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 71 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 72 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 73 | KANESHIGE Christina Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 74 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 75 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 76 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | WANG Ziqiao (Claire) | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 78 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 80 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ETZEL Rowan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 81 | PULLARA Ashley | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | KALGAONKAR Arohi | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 86 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 87 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 88 | FERNLUND Helen | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 89 | MCSWEENEY Janie | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 90 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 91 | SAVNER Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 92 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 93 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 93 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 95 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 96 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 97 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 98 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 99 | HILBY Olivia | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | LI Fei | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 101 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 102 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 103 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 103 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 105 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 106 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 107 | LANE Leah | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 108 | FREEMAN Kit | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 110 | REYNOLDS Elly | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 111 | PAN Angela | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 113 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 114 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 115 | GUSKA Jenn | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 116 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 118 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 119 | CHENG Wanrong | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 59% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 121 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 122 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.