Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KALLIO Jeffrey E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | ZIRKLE James | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 3 | TERENTIEV Max | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 3 | CHANG William | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 5 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 6 | MILLER Douglas S. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 7 | CHEN Brian | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 14% | |
| 8 | DIRSMITH Benjamin J. | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 5% | |
| 9 | MAURI Gherardo | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 10 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 11 | PLONKA Derek | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 12 | ROBLES Julio C. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 13 | MOODY Paul J. | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 14 | REYES Elain | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | SEIDEL Jonathan J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% |
| 16 | RICKERT Michael A. | 4% | 31% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 6% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Albert | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | CHECKEYE Daniel J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 21 | HERNDON Jameson D. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | DHAR asif | 17% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | MAK Carleton | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 24 | MAI Weiquan | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | YU Xu | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | WILLIAMS Brian | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.