Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GAY Sasha | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
2 | LIN Elaine | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
3 | KANG Ellie | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
3 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
5 | CASTELO Soleil | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 41% | 8% |
6 | YU Stella | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
7 | LEOU Korina | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
8 | KWON Hannah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
9 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
10 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
11 | WONG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
12 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
13 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
14 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
15 | KWON Ava | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
16 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
17 | JIANG Evelyn | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
18 | CONG Anne | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
19 | XU Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
20 | KAUL Tara | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
21 | TONG Laurie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
22 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
23 | YUEN Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
24 | LONG Jessie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
25 | PARK Haylie | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
26 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
27 | DHAR Rana | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
28 | LEE Grace | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% |
29 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
30 | YU Skylar | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
31 | LIU kai yin aria | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
32 | HU Heidi | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
33 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
34 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
35 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
36 | SUNG Olivia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
37 | FAN Alexandria | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
38 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
39 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
40 | WEI Madison | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
41 | SUNG Isabella | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
42 | WANG Tina | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
43 | GONG Joy | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
44 | MISHEV Lila | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
44 | JOSHI Samika | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
46 | KIM Saeren | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
47 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 37% | 10% |
48 | ZHU Avril | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
49 | DING Jolie | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | CHERON Helene | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 5% |
51 | WU Daisy | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
52 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
53 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
54 | JOHN Sophia | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
55 | MAK Jayden | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
56 | MEYERSON Michelle | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
57 | DOLEV Rony | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
58 | GOEL Lineysha | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
59 | HSIEH Lucia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
60 | HUANG Pierra | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
61 | MEADE Kaia G. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
62 | ZHAO Selena | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
63 | ZONG Eliane | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
64 | HWANG Sophie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
65 | WANG Emily | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
66 | NANDA Maanika | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
67 | XIAÖ Cindy | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
68 | KONZEN Iris | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
69 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
70 | HEATH Isabella | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
71 | CHANG Annette | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
72 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
73 | ELLINGWOOD Sophia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
74 | MULLER Inara | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
75 | MOTOVA Masha | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
76 | BURGESS Brees | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
77 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
78 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 1% | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
79 | KIM Grace | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
80 | LONG Chloe | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
81 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
82 | JUN Sofia | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
83 | NGUYEN Summer | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
84 | BANDHU Saahiti | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
85 | STOLCKE Saskia | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
86 | SEO Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
87 | KU Chloe | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
88 | LAI Karen | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
89 | ALMEDA Galina | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
90 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
91 | HWANG Charlotte | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
92 | OEI Allyson | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
93 | DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
93 | CHEN Cindy | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
95 | ARGUELLO Camilla | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
96 | CHENG Anna | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
97 | OLESKY Ellie | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
98 | WANG Keira | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
99 | SHI Maxine | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
99 | TABANCAY Ava | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
101 | KANIA Brigitte | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
102 | BUSSELL Ava | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
103 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
104 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
105 | ZOFFEL Gabriela | 2% | 17% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
106 | CHU-NAFPLIOTIS Nyssa | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
107 | FRAZIER Chloe | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
108 | FRANK Isabella | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
109 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
110 | HU Ashley | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
111 | MERRITT Annabelle | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
112 | FAN Tina | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
113 | CHAU Zoey | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
114 | GONG suri | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
115 | CORD Sophia | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
116 | ZHANG Audrey | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
116 | MALUKI Nia | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
118 | KARAVAS Lucy | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
119 | YADAV Tishya | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
120 | KATZ Emma | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
121 | KAZA Ananya | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
122 | KAZA Aditi | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
123 | BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
124 | FAGAN Cara | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
125 | YANG Caroline | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
126 | KO Ariel | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
127 | POWERS Waverly | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
128 | STANLEY Garance | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
129 | YANG Renee | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
130 | JUNG Elise | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
131 | DEMRY Kylee | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
132 | SOUTHWELL Mia | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
133 | FASSNACHT Jacqueline | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
134 | BACKES Anastasia | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
135 | CHACKO Anne | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
136 | YAP Anna | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
137 | SAGER Bianca | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
138 | CHEN Chloe | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
139 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
140 | HILD Anya | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
141 | BIESIADA Sophia | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
141 | LEE Elise | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
143 | JOHNSON Marlee | 27% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
144 | SON Ellie | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
145 | NEGROIU Mara | 9% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
145 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
147 | MAJEWSKA Maria | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
148 | ZHANG Olivia | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
149 | DIBADJ Ava | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
150 | YANG Felicia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
151 | GROSSMAN Elizabeth | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
151 | WEI Levana | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
153 | ESTEVES ZOE | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | - |
154 | PINES Kinsey | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
155 | SCHAMBERGER Amelia | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
156 | BABB Virginia | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
157 | YAO Elizabeth | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
158 | CHIU Philippa | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
159 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
160 | MUNSHI Ridhima | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
161 | SONG Phoebe | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
162 | WANG Selina | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
163 | BAO Amelia | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
164 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
164 | QIU Abigail | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
164 | NARUT Zoe | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
167 | PATEL Maia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
168 | HUANG Megan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
169 | SMITH Genevieve | 24% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
169 | FAN Yutong | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.