The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HEINS Dylan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
2 | HICKS Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
3 | ROBINSON Samuel | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
3 | KIM Ian | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
5 | ALLEGRETTI Zachary T. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
6 | ALTANGEREL Bilegjargal | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
7 | LIPTON Michael D. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
8 | LI Chester | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
9 | HSU Joshua | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
10 | NGUYEN Peyton | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
11 | SIRBU Dan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
12 | WONG Preston | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
13 | MITCHEM Paolo | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
14 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
15 | ZHAO Colin | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
16 | LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
17 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
18 | DEMANGONE Reed | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
19 | PREN Evan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
20 | ZHANG Daniel | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
22 | DILEEP Roshan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | MARTIN Zachary | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | TRAN Noble | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
25 | YAU Michael | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | - |
26 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 16% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | LEE Wei-Sheng | 14% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.