NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | GOH Cayla | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | SUN Zeyu | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 3 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
| 5 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 6 | XU Serena | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 7 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
| 8 | LIANG Jingjing | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 9 | KANG Kailin | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 10 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | VOSKOV Olivia | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | KONG Mila W. | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | DHAIYA Tanya | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | WANG Chloe | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LEE Gloria Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 16 | LI Caroline | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 18 | FANG Kayla | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHU Riley | - | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 20 | CHEN Alina | 1% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 22 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 23 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 24 | WEI Sherry | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | GANSER Nicole | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% |
| 26 | TRAN Katherine | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | GUAN Isabella | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 28 | BI Michelle | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 29 | MA Sophie | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 30 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | LIANG Carina | 4% | 37% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | YANG Eleanor | 1% | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | PAN Angela | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 34 | TAM Connie | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | CHI Sarah | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | AKUDOVICH Aleena | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 37 | LIN Cynthia | 5% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DU Andria | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BO GENESIS | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SALOUS Sarah | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SHEIKH PAREE | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 43 | GEFFNER Olivia | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | MENKIN Kate | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ALVAREZ Martine | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | SHETH Anayaà | 6% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | STOCKTON Catherine | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | LI Nicole | 23% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | SONG Charlotte | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | DIBENEDETTI Isabella | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YU Sara | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | GARCIA Aly | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 53 | REISNER Gabriella | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | SHABBIR Aiza | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.