NJ Convention & Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAZAROVA Sanam | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
| 2 | XU Jessica | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 3 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% | |
| 3 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 5 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 6 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 7 | SUN Zeyu | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 8 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 9 | FENG Ge | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 10 | LEE Claire | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 11 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
| 12 | ZHU Serene M. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 13 | XU Serena | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 22% | |
| 14 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 3% |
| 15 | EKSHTUT Leah | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 18 | HOAGLAND Sally | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | WANG Trinity | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 21 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | DU Andria | 24% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | KANG Kailin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | GANSER Nicole | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 26 | GOH Cayla | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 27 | MIINEA Elena | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
| 28 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% | |
| 30 | ZHU Riley | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | KONG Mila W. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | LIANG Carina | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | JUDICKE Olivia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 35 | KRAJA Emma | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 36 | YAO Chloe | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 37 | GUAN Isabella | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | WEI Sherry | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 39 | TRAN Helena | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 40 | GEFFNER Olivia | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | TAM Connie | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | PAN Angela | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 43 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 44 | FOMINA Polina | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | TRAN Katherine | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | REKEDA Anna | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 47 | STOCKTON Catherine | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | SATO Elyse | 5% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 17% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | LIN Cynthia | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BI Michelle | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | WOOLF Fredrika | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | MA Sophie | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | BO GENESIS | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | WONG Angelina | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 58 | AKUDOVICH Aleena | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | YANG Eleanor | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | LI Nicole | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | FAKTOR Emily | - | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 60 | KHANNA Bhairavi | 72% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHI Sarah | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | SHIN Jamie | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | TORRES AGUILERA Mika | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.