Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACKAY Katherine | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 2 | JIANG Evelyn | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 3 | KANG Ellie | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 5 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 6 | WONG Natalie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | YUEN Nicole | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 8 | WANG Jiayi | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 43% | 11% |
| 9 | YANG Caroline | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 10 | LONG Jessie | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
| 11 | YU Stella | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 12 | YU Skylar | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 13 | WANG Tina | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 14 | TONG Laurie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 15 | HSIEH Lucia | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 16 | HWANG Charlotte | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | LEMMEN Jasmijn | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 19 | ZHAI AMY | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 20 | CHENG Anna | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | LONG Chloe | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 22 | BORTAI Eliza | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | DOLEV Rony | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | CHANG Annette | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | KAZA Ananya | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | MORINAGA Mirai | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | TABANCAY Ava | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | ERPELDING Emily | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | BRIMMER Bella | 6% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | DUFF Caitlin | 3% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | MIKSOVSKY Katherine | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | KAZA Aditi | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | YANG Renee | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SONG Phoebe | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | BARRETT Maya | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | LI Meredith | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | BHAVSAR Vanmayi | 12% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | SULLIVAN Clara | 16% | 44% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LI Bernadette | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.