Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
2 | WU Nicole Moxuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
3 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
3 | DUAN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
5 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
6 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% |
7 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 15% | |
8 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% | |
9 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
10 | BAE Yooju | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
11 | ZOU Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
12 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | - |
13 | ZHAO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
14 | SAH Madeleine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
15 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% | |
15 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
17 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
18 | HUGHES Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% |
19 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
20 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
21 | ESAKI Kei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
22 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
23 | LIN Allison | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
24 | LI Audrey | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
25 | WU Allison | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
25 | SOE Hayleigh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
27 | ANWEILER Megan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
28 | HAN Mia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 34% | 5% | |
29 | FEDER Acadia | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
30 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
31 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
32 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
33 | AL-BATTAINEH Hana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
34 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 90% | 43% | 8% | - | |
35 | LU Keeva | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
36 | MA Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
37 | CHANG Olivia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
38 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | KIM Ellen | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
41 | CHEN Aimee | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
42 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
43 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
44 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
45 | YU Annie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
46 | YU Xintong | 100% | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
48 | WU Elynna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
49 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
50 | CHOI Lydia | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
51 | TU Averie | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
52 | CLAYTON Evelyn | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
53 | KIM Olivia | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
54 | MORENO Josefina | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
55 | JONES Rowan | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
56 | PAEK Mila | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
57 | JIANG Ziqing | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | MERRIMAN Evalyn | 100% | 33% | 2% | - | - | - | |
60 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.