Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Samantha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% | |
| 2 | WU Nicole Moxuan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 3 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 5 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 6 | YU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 12% |
| 7 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | 6% | 32% | 46% | 15% | |
| 8 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% | |
| 9 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 10 | BAE Yooju | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 11 | ZOU Ella | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 12 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | - |
| 13 | ZHAO Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | SAH Madeleine | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHOU Joi | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 10% | |
| 15 | LI Alice | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
| 17 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 5% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | HUGHES Olivia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | HSU Rachel | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 20 | LIU Ashley | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | ESAKI Kei | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | XIA Isabella | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | LIN Allison | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | LI Audrey | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | WU Allison | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | SOE Hayleigh | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 27 | ANWEILER Megan | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | HAN Mia | - | 1% | 18% | 46% | 29% | 5% | |
| 29 | FEDER Acadia | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | LEE Zoe E. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Doreen | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | ARYA Leela | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 33 | AL-BATTAINEH Hana | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 9% | 48% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 35 | LU Keeva | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | MA Isabelle | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
| 37 | CHANG Olivia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 38 | PAN Samantha | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KIM Ellen | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | CHEN Aimee | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | AHN Hayley | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | NEUMANN Erika | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
| 44 | WANG Ellen | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | YU Annie | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 46 | YU Xintong | 20% | 61% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | LEE Abigail | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | WU Elynna | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 49 | TEWARI Amaira | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | CHOI Lydia | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | TU Averie | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CLAYTON Evelyn | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Olivia | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MORENO Josefina | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | JONES Rowan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | PAEK Mila | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | JIANG Ziqing | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | PAWAR Sanvi | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MERRIMAN Evalyn | 67% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.