Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
2 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
3 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
3 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
5 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
6 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
8 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 21% |
9 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
10 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
11 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
12 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
13 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
14 | WANG Doreen | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
15 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
16 | TU Averie | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
17 | LEE Zoe E. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
18 | XIA Isabella | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
19 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 2% |
20 | LIU Mia | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | YU Sophie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
21 | CHEN Aimee | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
23 | LU Keeva | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
24 | KIM Natalie | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | YANG Olivia | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
25 | HSU Rachel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
27 | ARYA Leela | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
28 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
29 | AHN Hayley | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | LEE Abigail | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
31 | MORENO Josefina | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
32 | JIANG Ziqing | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
33 | TEWARI Amaira | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | QIAO Lori-Ann | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
35 | DESAI Zoya | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
36 | CHENG Audrey | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
37 | CHON SUBIN | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
38 | PAN Samantha | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
39 | CHEN bridgette | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
40 | YU Xintong | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
41 | JU Victoria | 1% | 9% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
42 | ANWEILER Megan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | LI Audrey | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
44 | ZHANG Selina | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
45 | KIM Rylie | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
46 | LI Beatrice | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | PAEK Ellie | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
48 | PAWAR Sanvi | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
49 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
50 | KIM Olivia | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
51 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | YOUN Davina | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
53 | LUO Olivia | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
53 | KIM Ellen | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
55 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | LIU Anya | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
57 | WANG Ellen | 27% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | WU Allison | < 1% | 1% | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
60 | PAEK Mila | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
61 | PENG Yuewei | 41% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | MERRIMAN Evalyn | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
63 | KIM Ines | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.