Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | |
| 3 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
| 5 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 6 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 7 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | |
| 8 | GU Eric | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 10 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 11 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 12 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 13 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 14 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% | |
| 17 | BO Genero | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
| 18 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 23 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | AU Joshua | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | SHAO Mason | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
| 29 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | HOLCOMB Liam | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | DAI Jason | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | SHI Evan | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | GILLARD Adan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MANUEL Eli | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 38 | CIANCHETTA David | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | LAZORISAK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 41 | WU Matthew | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | HUFF Alexander | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.