Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 2 | LI Lucas | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Nathan | - | - | - | - | 6% | 41% | 53% |
| 3 | CHANG Parker | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 5 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 6 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 7 | CHANG Jeremy | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 8 | PARK Andrew | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 9 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
| 10 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 11 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 11 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 54% | 28% |
| 13 | PAN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 14 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 15 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 16 | YEE Colin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 17 | GE Felix Fei | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 18 | YE Jerry | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
| 19 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | PARK Avan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | SLAIN Owen | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | RAU Shogun | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 4% |
| 24 | SHEN Alaric | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 27 | GUO Austin | 2% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | KUANG Cyrus | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 29 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 30 | SIU Max | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 31 | HUA Isaac | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | MAZAHERI John | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 34 | HUYNH Kaleb | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | REN Ryan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | TAN Alan | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | WILSON Jacob | - | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | MORALES Tycho | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | TURBAT Travis | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 42 | LIN Alden | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | CAO Joshua | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | HUANG Dalynn | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 45 | QIAN Henry | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 46 | CHAU Ivan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SHARMA Ari | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | HWANG Alexander | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | WU James | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | POST Bentley | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 52 | JIN Xueyuan George | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 53 | QIU Yiran | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | TEOH Liam | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | LI Alexander | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | HUDSON Arav | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | HOARE Gabriel | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LI Lief | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | CRONK Trevor | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | NGUYEN Nolan | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | CHUNG Royce | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | HU Anthony | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | MU Andy | < 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 64 | CHEUNG Henry | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | LIN Alex | 2% | 15% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 66 | WANG William | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 67 | CHEN Kyle | 16% | 44% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.