Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
2 | HSU leah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
3 | KWON Hannah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
3 | XU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
5 | KU Alathea-Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
6 | SUNG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
7 | KAUL Tara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
8 | ZHU Avril | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
9 | MOON Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
10 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
11 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
12 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% | |
13 | HEATH Isabella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
14 | KATZ Emma | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
15 | XIAÖ Cindy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
16 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | YE Madeleine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
18 | WANG Callie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
19 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
20 | JOSHI Samika | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
21 | WANG Emily | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
23 | KU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
24 | KIM Grace M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
25 | OH Chloe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
26 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
27 | SENGUPTA Jia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
28 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
29 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
30 | LAI Karen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
31 | ELLINGWOOD Sophia | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
32 | HU Heidi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | KANG Soeun | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
34 | CLAIANU Adriana | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
36 | NADKARNI Marisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
37 | BRIMMER Bella | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
38 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
39 | STOLCKE Saskia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
40 | GAO Olivia | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
41 | ZHANG Olivia | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
42 | HUANG Valencia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 5% | |
43 | FUCHS Umi | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
44 | OEI Allyson | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
45 | XU Rachel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
46 | MEADE Kaia G. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
47 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
48 | WANG Keira | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
49 | KIM Grace | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
50 | NARRELL Olive | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | |
51 | SONI Ruhee | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
52 | KO Ariel | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | |
53 | PEREIRA Izumi | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
54 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
55 | CHACKO Anne | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | FUCHS Tami | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
57 | MAJEWSKA Maria | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.