Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 2 | HSU leah | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | KWON Hannah | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 3 | XU Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% |
| 5 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 6 | SUNG Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 7 | KAUL Tara | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 8 | ZHU Avril | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | MOON Claire | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 10 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
| 11 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 12 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% | |
| 13 | HEATH Isabella | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | KATZ Emma | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 15 | XIAÖ Cindy | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | ZHAO Selena | 5% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | YE Madeleine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 18 | WANG Callie | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
| 19 | NIU Jessica | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 20 | JOSHI Samika | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | WANG Emily | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 23 | KU Chloe | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 24 | KIM Grace M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 25 | OH Chloe | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 26 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | SENGUPTA Jia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 28 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | LAI Karen | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ELLINGWOOD Sophia | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | HU Heidi | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | KANG Soeun | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | CLAIANU Adriana | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 36 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 37 | BRIMMER Bella | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | STOLCKE Saskia | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | GAO Olivia | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Olivia | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HUANG Valencia | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | |
| 43 | FUCHS Umi | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | OEI Allyson | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | XU Rachel | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 46 | MEADE Kaia G. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | WONG Charlene | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 48 | WANG Keira | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | KIM Grace | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NARRELL Olive | 4% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | SONI Ruhee | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 52 | KO Ariel | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | PEREIRA Izumi | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | 3% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 55 | CHACKO Anne | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | FUCHS Tami | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MAJEWSKA Maria | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.