Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
2 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% |
3 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% | |
3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
5 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
6 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
7 | ZHAO Olivia | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
8 | CAO Kayla | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 32% | 4% |
9 | PARK Zena | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
10 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
11 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
12 | ZHOU Joi | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
13 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
14 | LI Savannah | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 2% |
15 | LAI Miranda | - | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% | - |
16 | YIN Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
17 | BING Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% | |
18 | LI Olivia | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
19 | CHERNYKH Elina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 16% |
20 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
21 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
22 | NEUMANN Erika | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | |
23 | NWODO Naila | - | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 2% | |
25 | LEE Jeemin | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
26 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% | |
27 | PECK Madeleine | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
28 | WATSON Evelyn | - | 6% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
29 | KOU Elisha | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
30 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
31 | HU Sophie | - | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
32 | HO Peyton | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
34 | KRAHE Annika | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 15% | |
35 | GOITIA Genevieve | 1% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 7% | - | |
36 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 4% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - |
37 | SINGH Evangelina | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
38 | KNAPP Isabella | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
39 | HARRIS Parker | 2% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | DESERANNO Seren | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
41 | LEE Zoe E. | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
42 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
43 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | 4% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | |
44 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 3% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
45 | GE Lena Lan | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 5% | |
46 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | LI Christina | 3% | 38% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
48 | KIM Natalie | 4% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | FRASER Morgan | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
50 | TELEB Farida | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
52 | MALIK Manha | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
53 | DUVVA Sanika | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | CAO Amelie | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
55 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
56 | AKINBAMIRO Peluola | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | ZHANG Priscilla | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
58 | LI Emma Jing | 21% | 51% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | DING Jennifer | 70% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
60 | WU Emma | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
61 | RIVERA Leahy | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
62 | WU Jennifer | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |
63 | MITCHELL Macy | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | BROWN Katelyn | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
65 | TORNBERG Reagan | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
66 | HINDMAN Grace | 20% | 63% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.