Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | MCALISTER Ian | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 3 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 3 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 5 | HERNDON Liam | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 6 | TIEMANN Landen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 7 | MUGA Aiden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 8 | WANG aaron | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 9 | YANG Gary | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 10 | SOOS Whitman | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 12 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 13 | GONZALEZ Kian | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Tristan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | VINOTH Aaron | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 17 | RIM Eugene | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 18 | MEHROTRA Neel | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | GINZBURG Adam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 38% | 14% |
| 20 | RAO Neil | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | KUANG Aaron | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | PEREZ Daniel | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LESCURE Dimitri | - | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 24 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | DADE MAXIMUS | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | WANG Jiacheng | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | DECKER Hunter | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% | |
| 29 | JIANG Raymond | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 30 | HSU Joshua | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 31 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 32 | WANG Marcus | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | QIAN Irvine | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | LIU Zicheng | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | CARDENAS Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
| 36 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 1% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 37 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | YILMAZ Tarik | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | TUMULA Arihaan | 25% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | MANGAN Hunter | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 41 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 42 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | CHEN Leetyan | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 44 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | TESFAYE Elias | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ADDYSON Aidan | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | JIANG Harry | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | COHEN Nathan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 49 | NAM Nathaniel | 4% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 50 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Jayden | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 52 | POHL Philip | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | TIEKING Noah | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 54 | LU Haoyang | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 55 | OLSON Joseph | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HINTON Charles | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 57 | HUANG Ethan | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 59 | GONIMA Francisco | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | DEDMAN Dexter | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | DADE Augustus | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.