Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Royce | V D V V D | V V V V V V | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 2 | LEE Damien | D V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | DENISON Declan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | WONG Preston | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | MCLAREN Mason | V V D V D V | V V V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 6 | HINTON Evan | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 7 | AGGELER Donovan | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 8 | WAGEMANN Nathan M. | V D D D V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | VENET Téva | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 11 | NEICE William | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | RUFANOV Maxim | D V V V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 13 | PRAKASH Hari | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | MILEY Walker | V V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | CHARETTE Matthew | V D V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | CHARETTE Alex | D D V D V | V V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | GACIOCH Noah | V D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | URCIOLI Phenix | V V D V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 19 | LITTLE Alex | D V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | MILIN James | D D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | MUENKE Magnus | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | THEIS Sean | V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | MANDEL Christian | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | YOUNG Quentin | D V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | V V D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | ZHANG Austin | V V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 27 | STAFFORD Bryan | V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | KIM Tristan | V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | DIAZ Valentino | D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | BROWN Korbyn | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | KEITH Michael | D D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | KOHLER Florian | D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | HAMILTON Travis | V V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 34 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V D D V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 35 | KIM Remington | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 36 | DINGMAN Nash | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 37 | FU Adrian | D D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | REID Wesley | D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 38 | HERRON Jonathan | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 40 | COLLINS Kaden | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 41 | WILLIAMS Timothy | D D D V V D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 42 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | V D D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 43 | CREASON Nicholas | D V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 44 | BAUMAN Colin | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 45 | DENG Destin | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 46 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 46 | ITO WILSON Miles | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 48 | RIDLEY Alan P. | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | ANDERSON Donald | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 50 | CAMP Ryder | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 51 | STOY Patrick | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 52 | GALLIVAN James | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.