NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Emma | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 2 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 3 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 3 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 5 | YU Jane | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 7 | XIE Lillian | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | HAO Danica | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 9 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 9 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 27% |
| 11 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 38% | 11% |
| 12 | WANG Carol | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 13 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 14 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 48% | 14% |
| 16 | WANG Jasmine | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 8% | |
| 17 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 3% |
| 18 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 21% |
| 19 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 11% |
| 20 | FENG Audrey | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 22 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 23 | LI Eleanor | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 24 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 26 | JOO Natalie | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 29 | WHELAN Amelia | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KIM Claire | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Amabel | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | BABIAC Julia | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | |
| 34 | LIN Yunong | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | LI Han (Helina) | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | MARTIRE Alessandra | - | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | - | 9% | 40% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BERTOLINI Mia | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | MCFARLANE Asha | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | FIELD Julianna | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 41 | CASCONE Emily | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 7% | |
| 42 | LIU Kiki | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PUOPOLO Mia | - | 5% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 44 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | - | 5% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 45 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 3% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | LAZAR Carolina | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | WILES Maeve | 9% | 58% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | SHICK Veronika | 5% | 51% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 33% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | GREENLEAF Ella | 5% | 43% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | TOROPOVA Arina | 8% | 56% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LAO Sophia | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | POWLEDGE Cora | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | PANNONE Elisa | 19% | 52% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | KIEFER Priti | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | BELISTRI Isabella | 82% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | GUPTA-NWANZE Nisa | 82% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.