NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
2 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
3 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
3 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
5 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
6 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
7 | XIE Lillian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
8 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
9 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
9 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% |
11 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 11% |
12 | WANG Carol | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
13 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
14 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
15 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 14% |
16 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% | |
17 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 3% |
18 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% |
19 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 11% |
20 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
21 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
22 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
23 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
24 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
25 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
26 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
27 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
28 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
29 | WHELAN Amelia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
30 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - |
31 | KIM Claire | 100% | 89% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
32 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
33 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | |
34 | LIN Yunong | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
35 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
36 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - |
37 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
38 | BERTOLINI Mia | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
39 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
39 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
41 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 7% | |
42 | LIU Kiki | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | PUOPOLO Mia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - |
44 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - |
45 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | |
46 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | |
47 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | WILES Maeve | 100% | 91% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
49 | SHICK Veronika | 100% | 95% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
50 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 100% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
51 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 95% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
52 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
53 | TOROPOVA Arina | 100% | 92% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
54 | LAO Sophia | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
55 | POWLEDGE Cora | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
56 | PANNONE Elisa | 100% | 81% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
57 | KIEFER Priti | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
58 | BELISTRI Isabella | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
59 | GUPTA-NWANZE Nisa | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.