Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUNJAN Lena R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | BECKMAN Ana | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | XIONG Angelica | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | IYER Ishana | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 5 | MCGLADE Jasmine | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | SUN Zeyu | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | BROWN Amanda | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | SWENSON Nikita G. | D V V D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 9 | SCHMITT Harper | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 11 | WATTANAKIT Anda | D V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | V V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | MA Sophie | V V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | PATIL Amulya | D V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 15 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 16 | NELSON Grace E. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | V D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 18 | TANG Elaine | D V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | SWENSON Alexandra | D V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | BURKHARDT Krista L. | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | LI Suri | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 22 | TANG Ellen | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | BARANOSKI CHLOE | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | CHUANG Ramona | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 25 | ELTERMAN Kate | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | MOHAMED Faisa | V D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | CHAN Macie | D V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | MANIANGLUNG Jean | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | MOHAMED Siham | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 30 | BARTOSZUK Camilla | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | MCKENNA Analise | D V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | RITTERBUSCH Abigail | D D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | ZEHE Michele A. | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 34 | DEPAUW Adeline | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 35 | CHEEVER Katie | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.