Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STAMIS Kyle | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 2 | ZHENG LEON | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Christian F. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 3 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 5 | WONG Caleb W. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
| 6 | WANG Max | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 7 | BODKIN Jake M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 8 | SCHIMEL Luke | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 9 | JENSBY Jason | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 10 | KETT Richard | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 11 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 12 | COOKSON Leonardo | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 13 | LIU Andrew | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | WITCZAK Mateus | - | 1% | 8% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
| 15 | CHENG Brandon | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
| 16 | BERGER Jacob | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | SUN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 18 | LUAN Mark | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 19 | SADHU Neiyam | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | AO Christopher | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 21 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | GRIECI Noah | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 23 | POWER Alex | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | JI Johnson | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DE SIENA Salvatore | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | CARR Dylan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 27 | PORTER Dupree | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 28 | ARBEITMAN Evan | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | KUMAR Arjun | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | HARRINGTON Connor | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | IVRON Yonatan | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 32 | DESAUTELS Connor | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 33 | ZWAKA Jonas | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | COUNTS Nicholas | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 35 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SWIERZ Zachary | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | KALOUDIS Sean | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | LIEUWMA Nico | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | WEISS Toby | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | TERENTIEV Max | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 41 | ROSADO Sebastian | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TOZZI Massimo | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 43 | BAHK Caleb | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | MATTINGLY Ian | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 45 | BANSAL Krishiv | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | BLACKBURN Henry | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LYU SIYI | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 49 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | PODDAR Shameek | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 53 | IVRON Daniel | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WOLMART Zander | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | TSAI Kash | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | HENDERSON Lucas | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 57 | TASIKAS Peter | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 58 | SORENSEN Walker | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 58 | GREENE Kevin | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | GAO Kai | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | QUAIL Jonathan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 62 | SAYAR Luke | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.