Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 99% |
| 2 | SONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 5 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 6 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | HUREL Bertille | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 50% | 18% |
| 9 | BRUNSON Nile | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 10 | CHOY LeeAnn | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 11 | YU Eva | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 12 | WESER Veronica U. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 13 | XU Serena | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 14 | BRAGG Leah | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | - |
| 16 | LEE Claire | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 17 | SU Evelyn | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 19 | QI Julieanne | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | YOU Isabel B. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 22 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 9% |
| 23 | LIN Victoria T. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | XIAO Nancy | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | COLELLA Lauren | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SHU Youshan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 27 | PETROFF Eva | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WEI Sherry | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 30 | ILYAS Ayah | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | ZHU Serene M. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 34 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 36 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | - | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | TRAN Helena | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | CHI Sarah | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KAUR Manroop | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | FANG Jocelyn | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PAN Angela | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | EKSHTUT Leah | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | YAO Chloe | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | JUDICKE Olivia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | LEE Gloria Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 50 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | DU Andria | 6% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | < 1% | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 53 | BYRON Karen J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 54 | TCHERNYSHOV ANNA | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | MONITTO Malina | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GEFFNER Olivia | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | SATO Elyse | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | QUADRI Saira | 27% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HALL Henrietta | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | DUNNE Jessica | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | ALVAREZ Martine | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | CHEN Ava | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.