Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
2 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 56% | |
3 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 33% |
3 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% |
5 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
6 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
7 | JOO Natalie | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
8 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
9 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
10 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
11 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
12 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
13 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
14 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
15 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 2% | |
16 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 48% | 32% |
17 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 3% |
18 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% |
19 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
20 | BABIAC Julia | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
21 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
21 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
23 | WANG YiXi | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 52% | 17% |
24 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% |
25 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
26 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
27 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 5% |
28 | WANG Amabel | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
29 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 2% |
30 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 5% |
31 | LI Katerina | - | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | 5% | 28% | 50% | 17% | |
33 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
34 | LENZ Zoe N. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
34 | WANG Sabrina | - | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
36 | WANG YIRAN | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
37 | ROY Layla | - | - | 9% | 38% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
38 | YU Jane | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
39 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 1% | 11% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
40 | WANG CAROL | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
41 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
42 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 11% | 50% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
43 | WEI Angela | - | 1% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
44 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | JIANG Chloe | 6% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
46 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
47 | HU Felice | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
48 | BASILE Gianna | 4% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | |
49 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
50 | HAO Danica | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
51 | KATS Ekaterina | 8% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
53 | SAKALLA Serene | 2% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
54 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
55 | LIU Eva | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
56 | KIM Claire | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | LIU Kiki | 11% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
58 | CHEN Sophie | 11% | 48% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
59 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
60 | BADLANI Diya | 11% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
61 | BERTOLINI Mia | 39% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | SHICK Veronika | 20% | 55% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
63 | REZA Fukaina | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
64 | KO Darby | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 21% | 63% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 36% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | WILES Maeve | 8% | 67% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | CASTRO Sabine | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
69 | WU Doreen | 69% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
69 | MUNOZ Isabella | 87% | 13% | - | - | - | - | - |
71 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
72 | VAROQUA Tala | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
73 | JUVVADI Aanika | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
73 | LIU Ella | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
75 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.