Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Lea | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 2 | BROCK Sydney | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
| 3 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 5 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | YAO Rainie | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 8 | WANG Jiayi | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 9 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 10 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 11 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 12 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | LO Chloe | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% |
| 15 | KIM Satie | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 16 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 40% | 38% |
| 18 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 20 | NING Lynn | - | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LIU kai yin aria | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | DUDNICK Morgan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | YUEN Nicole | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | NAVARRO LARIOS KATE | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | MUNGUIA Mila | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | WONG Natalie | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 28 | GAY Sasha | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 29 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 30 | KIM Alexia | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 32 | LOMOTAN Addison | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 33 | YAM Danika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 34 | LEE Lauren | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 37 | STONE Coral | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | OCA Merci | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LIN Annika | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ZHAI Amy | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 41 | WILSON Eva | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | JOHNSON Heaven | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LIU Hannah | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | RIVERA Brenda | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 45 | NAKA Emily | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | KIRBY Skye | 4% | 47% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | BAIRD Kaleah | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LIN Abbey | 7% | 38% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | CAI Veronica | 26% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SANTOS Charlize | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LIN Ariel | 27% | 40% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WALLIS Allie | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | PANCHAL Arya | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | ANDERSON Kathryn | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.