2019 USA Fencing Anaheim SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Saber

Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Shawn J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22%
2 MA Jonathan D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 44%
3 GREENBAUM Maxwell H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
3 KUPANOFF Dimitri N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
5 LIANG Connor 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
6 FLORES Peter D. 100% 99% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
7 SOHN Kevin J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 15%
8 REESE Aaron S. 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
9 CALLAHAN Jaden P. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 5%
10 RAI Avin 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
11 IWAMOTO Eric Y. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
12 OSTER Keegan J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
13 DINU Nicholas D. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 25%
14 VACCARI Braden 100% 98% 76% 38% 11% 2% -
15 HEATHCOCK Colin 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 3%
16 ZHOU Matthew R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
17 MARSEE James 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
18 DEMAREST Iain 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 21%
18 KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
20 PRIEST Leighton K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 13%
21 DHINGRA Gian K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 11%
22 KIM Benjamin H. 100% 99% 87% 58% 24% 5% -
23 HU William 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 22%
24 CHO Brandon 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
25 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
26 HARLEY Colby A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
26 WINKLER Lucas G. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 7%
28 KIM Minwook 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
29 GRATHWOL-SEAR Sebastian 100% 98% 84% 54% 21% 5% -
30 BREIER Satchel E. 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 12% 1%
31 HONG Marshall Q. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
32 NOBLE Daniel 100% 99% 84% 50% 18% 3% -
33 BARBER William S. 100% 98% 82% 46% 14% 2% -
34 SEVOSTYANOV Stepan (Seva) 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
35 NG Jonathan H. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
36 KIM Sean G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 26%
37 KANG Brandon M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
38 LIMB Matthew G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 59% 18%
39 JEFFORDS Alexander 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
40 QUAN Nicholas 100% 100% 94% 75% 42% 14% 2%
41 WESLER Logan A. 100% 72% 30% 6% 1% -
42 WILLIAMS Nolan E. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 8%
43 GINIS Nathan 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 8% 1%
44 SHEPANEK Noah M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
44 ALKIN Isaac 100% 91% 62% 27% 6% 1% -
46 WUN William 100% 100% 98% 83% 44% 12% 1%
47 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 2%
48 SHIN Richard J.H. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
49 DILLREE Spencer S. 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
50 TANG Brendan J. 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 15% 2%
51 LE Hayden 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
52 CHANG Brandon 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4%
53 TRINH Trevor Z. 100% 99% 88% 60% 27% 7% 1%
54 SMITH David C. 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 5%
55 YATES Colum C. 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
56 BERGER Oliver 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
57 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
58 YANG Ziyi 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
59 STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 7%
60 REDFIELD Jack 100% 94% 64% 20% 3% - -
61 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 11% 1%
62 LIU Kelly 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
63 CHU Sean L. 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1%
64 SATHE Tej R. 100% 74% 34% 9% 1% - -
65 GREEN IV James (Bud) 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 13% 1%
66 SINGER Carson 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 2%
67 TANG Alex Y. 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
68 LI Joshua L. 100% 94% 62% 22% 4% - -
69 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 89% 54% 19% 4% - -
70 HASNAH Henry 100% 77% 35% 8% 1% - -
71 ZHANG Michael M. 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
72 HARLEY Sage N. 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 6% 1%
72 RUNDLETT Jakob C. 100% 88% 51% 17% 3% - -
74 WANG Eric Y. 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
75 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. 100% 87% 54% 20% 4% - -
76 BAILEY Asher 100% 100% 95% 74% 39% 12% 1%
77 CHANG Colin S. 100% 98% 82% 47% 16% 3% -
78 GAFFNEY John M. 100% 74% 25% 3% - - -
78 JINICH Ilan R. 100% 93% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
80 BROWNE JR ROLSTON D. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
81 KIM Andrew H. 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
82 DEAK Gabriel M. 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
83 MYERS Kaleb S. 100% 97% 77% 38% 11% 1% -
83 WYCHE Scott H. 100% 83% 44% 14% 2% - -
85 LEUNG Nathan 100% 61% 17% 2% - - -
86 MICHNA Colin P. 100% 82% 44% 14% 3% - -
87 KAYDALIN Artyom 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
88 TANN Justin 100% 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1%
89 REED Samuel J. 100% 30% 4% - - - -
90 HJERPE Wade H. 100% 94% 70% 33% 8% 1% -
91 VO Minh Q. 100% 55% 15% 2% - - -
92 ROSS Avi J. 100% 70% 24% 3% - - -
92 JEFFERY Jakob 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -
94 KIM Noah L. 100% 72% 32% 8% 1% - -
95 VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. 100% 82% 37% 8% 1% - -
95 KORINTH Alexander J. 100% 34% 5% - - - -
95 LEITH Jack 100% 39% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.