The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

2019 USA Fencing Anaheim SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Saber

Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Shawn J. - - 2% 9% 27% 39% 22%
2 MA Jonathan D. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
3 GREENBAUM Maxwell H. - - - 3% 16% 41% 39%
3 KUPANOFF Dimitri N. - - - 1% 12% 40% 47%
5 LIANG Connor - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
6 FLORES Peter D. 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
7 SOHN Kevin J. - - 3% 15% 32% 35% 15%
8 REESE Aaron S. - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8%
9 CALLAHAN Jaden P. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
10 RAI Avin - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
11 IWAMOTO Eric Y. - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
12 OSTER Keegan J. - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
13 DINU Nicholas D. - 1% 7% 26% 41% 25%
14 VACCARI Braden 2% 22% 38% 27% 9% 2% -
15 HEATHCOCK Colin - 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
16 ZHOU Matthew R. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 18%
17 MARSEE James - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
18 DEMAREST Iain - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
18 KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. - 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
20 PRIEST Leighton K. - - 1% 12% 36% 38% 13%
21 DHINGRA Gian K. - - 2% 14% 37% 36% 11%
22 KIM Benjamin H. 1% 11% 30% 34% 18% 5% -
23 HU William - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 22%
24 CHO Brandon 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
25 FRISHMAN Ethan J. - 2% 12% 28% 34% 19% 4%
26 HARLEY Colby A. - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 11%
26 WINKLER Lucas G. - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
28 KIM Minwook - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
29 GRATHWOL-SEAR Sebastian 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
30 BREIER Satchel E. 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 11% 1%
31 HONG Marshall Q. - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
32 NOBLE Daniel 1% 15% 34% 32% 15% 3% -
33 BARBER William S. 2% 16% 37% 32% 12% 2% -
34 SEVOSTYANOV Stepan (Seva) - - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11%
35 NG Jonathan H. - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
36 KIM Sean G. - - - 5% 24% 44% 26%
37 KANG Brandon M. - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
38 LIMB Matthew G. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
39 JEFFORDS Alexander - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
40 QUAN Nicholas - 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
41 WESLER Logan A. 28% 43% 23% 6% 1% -
42 WILLIAMS Nolan E. - - 4% 18% 38% 33% 8%
43 GINIS Nathan 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
44 SHEPANEK Noah M. - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
44 ALKIN Isaac 9% 29% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
46 WUN William - 2% 15% 39% 32% 10% 1%
47 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. - 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 2%
48 SHIN Richard J.H. - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
49 DILLREE Spencer S. 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
50 TANG Brendan J. - 4% 16% 33% 32% 13% 2%
51 LE Hayden 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
52 CHANG Brandon - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
53 TRINH Trevor Z. 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
54 SMITH David C. - 1% 9% 26% 36% 22% 5%
55 YATES Colum C. 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
56 BERGER Oliver 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
57 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. - - 4% 17% 36% 32% 10%
58 YANG Ziyi 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 3%
59 STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
60 REDFIELD Jack 6% 30% 43% 18% 3% - -
61 DENNER Maximilian P. - 4% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
62 LIU Kelly 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
63 CHU Sean L. 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
64 SATHE Tej R. 26% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -
65 GREEN IV James (Bud) - 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
66 SINGER Carson 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
67 TANG Alex Y. 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
68 LI Joshua L. 6% 33% 39% 18% 4% - -
69 HOUTZ Jackson 11% 36% 34% 15% 3% - -
70 HASNAH Henry 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
71 ZHANG Michael M. 5% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
72 HARLEY Sage N. 1% 9% 27% 36% 21% 5% 1%
72 RUNDLETT Jakob C. 12% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
74 WANG Eric Y. 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
75 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
76 BAILEY Asher - 5% 21% 35% 28% 10% 1%
77 CHANG Colin S. 2% 16% 35% 31% 13% 3% -
78 GAFFNEY John M. 26% 50% 21% 3% - - -
78 JINICH Ilan R. 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
80 BROWNE JR ROLSTON D. - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
81 KIM Andrew H. - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
82 DEAK Gabriel M. 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
83 MYERS Kaleb S. 3% 20% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
83 WYCHE Scott H. 17% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
85 LEUNG Nathan 39% 44% 15% 2% - - -
86 MICHNA Colin P. 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
87 KAYDALIN Artyom 4% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
88 TANN Justin - 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
89 REED Samuel J. 70% 26% 4% - - - -
90 HJERPE Wade H. 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1% -
91 VO Minh Q. 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
92 ROSS Avi J. 30% 46% 21% 3% - - -
92 JEFFERY Jakob 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
94 KIM Noah L. 28% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
95 VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. 18% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
95 KORINTH Alexander J. 66% 29% 5% - - - -
95 LEITH Jack 61% 33% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.