The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
2 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
3 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
3 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
5 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
6 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
7 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 7% |
8 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 9% |
9 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
10 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
11 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
12 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
13 | JIN Xueyuan George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 34% | 3% |
14 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
15 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 7% |
16 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
17 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
18 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
19 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 6% |
20 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
21 | ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
22 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
23 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 5% |
24 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
25 | PARK Avan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
26 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
27 | DIFRANK Avery | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
28 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
29 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
30 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
31 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
32 | SHAH Aadi | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
33 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% |
34 | LI Andrew | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - |
35 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
36 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% |
37 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
38 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
38 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
40 | DANTON Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
41 | MCCOOL Henry | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
42 | LI Andy | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
43 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
44 | WILSON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
45 | TEOH Liam | 100% | 90% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - |
46 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 98% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - |
47 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
47 | TAN Alan | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
49 | WATERFIELD Lysander | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
50 | CHAU Ivan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
51 | ALTENHOF Nathaniel | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
53 | HUDSON Arav | 100% | 83% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
54 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
55 | HOARE Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
55 | KALINA Levi | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 85% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
58 | HWANG Jasper | 100% | 84% | 40% | 7% | - | - |
59 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | LIU Bradley | 100% | 98% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - |
60 | SIN TaeHwan | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
62 | QIU Yiran | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
64 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | HAN JINHA | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
66 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.