NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | POWER Alex | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 3 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 3 | YOSHEA Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 5 | BRADLEY Raphael F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 6 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 52% | 17% |
| 7 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 8 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | |
| 9 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 9 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 11 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 12 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 12 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 14 | WOLMART Zander | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 18 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 19 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 20 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 21 | COOKSON Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 22 | JANUS Maksymilian | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 4% | |
| 25 | TERENTIEV Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 26 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
| 26 | LIEUWMA Nico | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 32 | STEVENS Flynn | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 34 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 6% |
| 37 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | ANSARI Umayr | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | BINSHTOK Max | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZONG Yujie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 45 | ARBEITMAN Evan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | MCCALL Aidan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | HOWARD Demani | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | MAPES Tanner | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | NGO Emerson | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | PEDICONE Joseph | 100% | 94% | 64% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | QUAIL Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | BLACKBURN Henry | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | YEHE-NARA William | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LIBBY Benjamin | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | QUINTERO Mateo | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.