Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ||
| 1 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 93% | 82% | 63% | 39% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 2 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 93% | 83% | 65% | 44% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 89% | 73% | 47% | 21% | 4% | |
| 4 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 89% | 76% | 58% | 38% | 21% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 5 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 84% | 68% | 47% | 26% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - |
| 6 | FERRARO Peter M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 94% | 84% | 68% | 47% | 28% | 13% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 7 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 94% | 85% | 69% | 49% | 29% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 8 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 88% | 72% | 51% | 31% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 40% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 10 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 88% | 69% | 43% | 19% | 5% | 1% | ||||||||
| 11 | TSIMBINOS Thomas R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 58% | 30% | 11% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 12 | WU Wesley E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 88% | 70% | 45% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - | |||||||
| 13 | HU Robin | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 53% | 25% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 14 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 82% | 59% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - | |||||||
| 15 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | ||||||||||||||
| 17 | BRENNAN Euwen T. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |||||||||||||
| 18 | ZEAREBAN Zakariya I. | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | MEYERS Lee P. | 100% | 88% | 42% | 8% | - | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | DESOLA Damian C. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | ||||||||||||||
| 21 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.