Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Zachary D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 92% | 82% | 65% | 45% | 26% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 2 | LEVITT Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 80% | 62% | 42% | 22% | 9% | 3% | - | - |
| 3 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 90% | 77% | 59% | 37% | 18% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 4 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 93% | 82% | 64% | 43% | 23% | 9% | 3% | - | - | |
| 5 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 90% | 79% | 61% | 41% | 22% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
| 6 | CARR Oliver G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 93% | 83% | 66% | 46% | 26% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 7 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 87% | 70% | 47% | 26% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 8 | NOLTEMY Daniel J. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 9 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 85% | 63% | 35% | 12% | 2% | |||||||
| 10 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 89% | 71% | 45% | 20% | 5% | 1% | ||||||||
| 11 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 67% | 40% | 18% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 12 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 77% | 52% | 27% | 10% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 13 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 86% | 64% | 38% | 16% | 5% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||
| 14 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 80% | 57% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | ||||||||
| 15 | BOHRA Rohan | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 16 | GARRELICK David S. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||
| 17 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 60% | 17% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 18 | DERING Alexander | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||||
| 19 | MAKAROVSKIY Alexander | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.