Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
2 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
3 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
5 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
6 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
7 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
8 | PETROVA Kristina | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 44% |
9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
10 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
11 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 45% | 9% |
13 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
14 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 53% |
15 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
16 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
17 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 52% | 30% |
17 | HAYES Nadia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 31% | 66% |
19 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
20 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
21 | WANG YiXi | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% |
22 | YANG Emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
23 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
24 | KIM Rachael | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
24 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 31% |
26 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 47% | 10% | |
27 | MI Aileen | - | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% | |
28 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
29 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
30 | YANG Iris | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 48% | 15% |
31 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
32 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 6% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
33 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 53% | 22% |
34 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
35 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% |
36 | KO Claire | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
37 | ZHANG Eunice | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
38 | OH Ceana | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
39 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
40 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% |
41 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
42 | XIA youyang | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
43 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 43% | 6% |
44 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
45 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
46 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 49% | 12% |
47 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
48 | LIU Enjia Sherry liu | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
49 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
50 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 16% |
50 | DENG Melissa | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
52 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
52 | SHIM Grace J. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
54 | KIM Rachel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
55 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
55 | AADHI Hansika | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | FENG Grace | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
58 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
59 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
60 | JOO Natalie | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
61 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - |
62 | LI Eleanor | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
63 | ZELDIN Nadia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | - |
64 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
65 | SHEN Emilia | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
66 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 53% | 15% |
67 | LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
68 | YANG Audrey | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
69 | SUN Emily | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
70 | HAO Danica | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
71 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 9% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
72 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
73 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
74 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
75 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 1% |
76 | WYNN Kylie | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
77 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
78 | WANG YIRAN | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 42% | 8% |
79 | LIU Ziyu | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
80 | ZHANG Ivy | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 8% |
81 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
83 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
84 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
85 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
85 | WU Chingfei Amber | 16% | 55% | 25% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
87 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 14% | 1% |
88 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
89 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
90 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
91 | KIM Sydney | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | LUO Miranda | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
93 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 8% | |
94 | CHEN Sophie | 22% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
95 | LIU YiYang | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
96 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
97 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
97 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
99 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
100 | DEL CURA Jara | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
101 | GU Maggie Runlin | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
102 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
103 | REN Kayley | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
104 | FUNG Vera | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
105 | SHMUKLER Maria | 1% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
106 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | 4% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
107 | YAO Ada | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
108 | ZOU Ella | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
109 | HOBSON Ava | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
110 | LAI Sophia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
111 | HARRIS Julia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
112 | BABIAC Julia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
113 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 4% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 3% | |
113 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 3% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
115 | WANG CAROL | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
116 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
117 | HSU Kaylin | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
118 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | - |
119 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - |
120 | STRUGAR Steliana | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
121 | HU Felice | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
122 | FENG Audrey | - | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
123 | MEI Sarah | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
124 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
125 | FIELD Julianna | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | - |
126 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 8% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
127 | BADLANI Diya | 18% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
128 | CASTANEDA Keira | 1% | 12% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
129 | CASCONE Emily | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% | - |
130 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
131 | KIM Claire | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
132 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
133 | LI Sophia M. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
134 | MCFARLANE Asha | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
135 | LI Yuhe | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
136 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - |
137 | SHTEPA Rada | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
138 | FIELD Elizabeth | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
139 | RICHARD Clara | 2% | 42% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | |
140 | XIE Lillian | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
141 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 2% |
142 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
142 | XIE Su | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
144 | ROY Layla | - | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - |
144 | WANG Joanna | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
146 | WANG SIQI | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
147 | SULTER Aurelie | 7% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
148 | BEAVER Ava | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
148 | LIU Kiki | 8% | 62% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
150 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
151 | HAN Crystal | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
152 | BERGEL Daphne | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
153 | DONG Angela | 1% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
154 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
155 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
156 | WANG Amabel | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
157 | DESAI Esha | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
158 | LI Katerina | 5% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
159 | BLAKEY Heaven | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
159 | WHELAN Amelia | - | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
161 | ZHENG Julie | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
161 | BROWN Lola | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
163 | BASILE Gianna | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
164 | OWENS Elise | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
165 | LENK Sophie | - | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% | - | |
166 | SHICK Veronika | 71% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
167 | RICHARD Dominique | 10% | 49% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
168 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% | - |
169 | HAN Ashley | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
170 | YU Jane | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
171 | ZHANG Selena | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
172 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
172 | PAULUS Isabella | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
174 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
175 | LEVY Avery | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
175 | WEI Angela | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
177 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
178 | BAE Yooju | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
179 | ELMALLAH sarah | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
180 | ALKADI Mai | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
180 | QUINN Anna | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
182 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 4% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
183 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
183 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
185 | WANG Xiaolan | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
186 | SONG Jenna | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
187 | KO Darby | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
188 | YU Lauren C. | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
189 | QIAN Zhiyan | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
190 | HU Jenna | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
191 | POWLEDGE Cora | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
192 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
193 | WANG Chloe | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
194 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 63% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | |
195 | CHANG Janelle | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
196 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
197 | JUVVADI Aanika | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
198 | SHIN Jaelynn | 54% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
198 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
198 | DIPAOLO Julia | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
198 | CULLEN Alyssa | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
198 | MAYER Cécile | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
203 | CANO Sofia | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
203 | CHOI ERIN | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
203 | CHOI Cara | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
203 | MUNOZ Isabella | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
207 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 85% | 14% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.