Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CAMPBELL Justin | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LIU Hangda | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 3 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | MILES Greyson | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 6 | MCARTHUR Kemp | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | COUSINS Patrick | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | D D V V D D | V V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 9 | HAN Nathan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | SHULER Alden | V V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 11 | WATERS Samantha M. | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | WELCH Ethan | V V V V D D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 13 | RILEY Owen | D V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | LEE Junehyuk | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | BAIRD Andrew | V D V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 16 | COLLETTE Tobias | V D V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | WANDEL Ethan S. | V V D V V V | D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 18 | HAZEL Susan L. | V V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 19 | ARNOLD jacob | V V D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 20 | FLYNN Oliver | V V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 21 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | D D V D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 22 | HAYWOOD Madison | D V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | MCLAUGHLIN Carter | D V D V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | HUGHES Kayla | D V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | SANDERS Andrew | V D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | OH Seonghun | D D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | SMITH Katherine E. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | KADRIC Max | V D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | BARRETT John | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | CARDINAL Elise | D V D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | HOANG Ethan | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | PUTNAM Nicholas | D V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 33 | SCOTT Ford | D D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 34 | DAILEY John | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | LANDRY Calem | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 36 | LIONBERGER Gillian | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 37 | BALL Jada | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 38 | MARTIN Stella | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 39 | DEMPSEY-GANTENBEIN Ace | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 40 | DZIELINSKI Sarah | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | MCGOWAN Ana | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.