Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAMPBELL Justin | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 2 | LIU Hangda | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 3 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 13% |
| 3 | MILES Greyson | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 40% | 8% |
| 5 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 6 | MCARTHUR Kemp | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 7 | COUSINS Patrick | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 2% |
| 8 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | HAN Nathan | - | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | SHULER Alden | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | WATERS Samantha M. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 12 | WELCH Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 13 | RILEY Owen | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Junehyuk | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | - |
| 15 | BAIRD Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 16 | COLLETTE Tobias | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | WANDEL Ethan S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 59% |
| 18 | HAZEL Susan L. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ARNOLD jacob | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | FLYNN Oliver | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | HAYWOOD Madison | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | MCLAUGHLIN Carter | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 24 | HUGHES Kayla | 6% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | SANDERS Andrew | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 26 | OH Seonghun | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | SMITH Katherine E. | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KADRIC Max | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 29 | BARRETT John | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CARDINAL Elise | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 31 | HOANG Ethan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | PUTNAM Nicholas | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SCOTT Ford | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | DAILEY John | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LANDRY Calem | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LIONBERGER Gillian | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | BALL Jada | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 38 | MARTIN Stella | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | DEMPSEY-GANTENBEIN Ace | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | DZIELINSKI Sarah | 6% | 38% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MCGOWAN Ana | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.