TRECS Gym - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URBANSKI Logan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 2 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 3 | LIM Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
| 3 | BUZINKAI Brennan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 5 | CHALMERS Thomas | - | 12% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | < 1% |
| 6 | KEMLE Brian | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 7 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% |
| 8 | JOHNSON Soren | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | SINGH Arnav | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 15% |
| 11 | BEDWORTH Paige | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 12 | EDWARDS Tim | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 13 | DREWRY William | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | MCNARY Ross | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 15 | CARRIE Konnor | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 16 | CRAIG Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | BABBITT Phoenix | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 19 | TOMASI John | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | SHELLABARGER Stephen | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | |
| 21 | MCNARY Sean | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | SAYLER Gordon | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | PETE Landon | - | 5% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | PLANAS Ethan | 23% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 25 | BARRETT John | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | PARKER Jordan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 27 | ZIVENKO Oleksii | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | DERRINGER Drew | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | HAYES Zackery | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | BROCK Maya | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | DREWRY Alexandra | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | SEATON Luna | 6% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ROBERTSON Nolan | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 35 | HAUSER Samuel | 8% | 46% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MACGREGOR Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | CARRUTH Mae | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | PIERCE Robert | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WATKINS Christopher | 2% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | HEINLEY Jackson | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | BENJAMIN John | 3% | 44% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.