Chaminade High School - West Hills, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 55% | 17% |
| 2 | FLANAGAN Miles | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 3 | BORG Matthew | - | - | 6% | 33% | 46% | 14% | |
| 3 | MCCARVILL Cooper | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 5 | HERMAN Max | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 6 | TURNER Finian | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | CHARETTE Matthew | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 8 | DEGANTE Johan | - | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 9 | TRAN Matthew | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | < 1% |
| 10 | BRADY Benjamin | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 12 | CHARETTE Alex | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 13 | BELTRANSOLORZANO Jared | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 14 | LAPP Jack | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 15 | SONDHI Aekagra | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | COLLIGAN Apollo | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | ROSE Jacob W. | 2% | 28% | 46% | 21% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 18 | SMITH Jeremiah | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 19 | MARQUEZ Jacob | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 20 | ISMAGILOV Max | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 21 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 22 | WOO Lucas | - | - | 2% | 22% | 48% | 28% | |
| 23 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DACKO Nolan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | PETRAITIS Matteus | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 26 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | CROUTCH Justin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ZHANG Jack | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 29 | YOUNG Luke | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 30 | KNIGHT Rollan | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | MARTINEZ Jorge | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | ROY Barnabe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 33 | LEE Benjamin | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 15% | |
| 34 | GONZALEZ Elias | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | GRACZYK James | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | LEVINE Reed | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% | |
| 38 | FURBERG Maxwell | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | JONES Rodney | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | ZAPATA Matthew | - | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 41 | COREAS Aaron | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | CAMP Ryder | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DIAZ Zahir | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | BRISTING Matthew | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | FLORES Bernardo | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 46 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 14% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | KANT Jasper | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BOYAPATI Pranav | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MILNE Lennox | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 50 | TORRES A Leonardo | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | MURPHY Parker | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 52 | BIHLMEIER Gavin | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | ESQUIVEL SOLIS Matthew | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | HERNANDEZ Ramon | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 55 | KATAN Miro | 27% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GREENBURG Jackson | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | SAUTER Luke | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | STASHWICK Tilly | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | BISSADA Matthew | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | ARIAS CALIX Franklin | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.